I took over 200 photos with the iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Galaxy S24 Ultra — here's the winner
On top of that, the iPhone 16 Pro Max’s main camera again pulls in crisper details in these shots at 1x zoom. Take a look at the band on her Apple Watch, it has more definition on it, while the Galaxy S24 Ultra looks more smudgy. Both do a great job at isolating her from the background, but I like the softer look of the background with the iPhone.
The iPhone 16 is the cheapest and least technically impressive new iPhone. It's also probably the one you should buy.
CNET on MSN4d
Apple iPhone 16 Pro and Pro Max Review: Compelling Upgrade With My Favorite iPhone Feature in YearsThe $999 iPhone 16 Pro and $1,199 iPhone 16 Pro Max have everything we've come to expect in a year-over-year upgrade. They ...
Engadget's review of the iPhone 16 Pro and Pro Max, including detailed camera testing and analysis of Camera Control, battery ...
The iPhone 16 I tested doesn’t have the word “Pro” in its name, but it’s easy to forget that when I’m using its new dedicated ...
Ahead of Apple's It's Glowtime event, there are a few iPhone 16 cases. Here's what an iPhone 15 Pro Max looks like, inside one of the new accessories. As is often the case, mock up dummy ...
The Max might be too big. Maybe you don't need a Pro? But my entire testing period ... aren't utilizing the “Pro” features like recording video in ProRes codec. Dare I say the iPhone 16 ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback