Academics are accusing several AI startups of co-opting the peer review process at ICLR, a long-running AI conference, for ...

The peer review process is central to science – but it can be easily manipulated. Improving it is vital to uphold research integrity.

According to the release, the NIH's proposal to centralize peer review is "under review with implementation pending external ...

Sakana said its AI generated the first peer-reviewed scientific publication. But while the claim isn't untrue, there are ...

Peer review ensures the findings of research are trustworthy. But what happens when it’s performed by an AI model?

Queen’s researchers are investigating how scientific journals could improve their process for reviewing and publishing new papers. Can paying referees help?

Agency says move will save money and reduce bias, but researchers are concerned about associated staff reductions ...

Today the National Institutes of Health is announcing plans to centralize peer review of all applications for grants, cooperative agreements and research and development contracts within the agency's ...

Institutional peer review led to recommended changes in more than one-quarter of radiotherapy treatment plans, according to results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.Recommendations for changes ...

The increasing involvement of AI in the peer review process raises concerns about its impact on academic publishing. An ...

In a stark sign of scientists’ escalating frustration with how academic journals operate, researchers are taking on six ...

At NIH, we are working to optimize our resources to support the best science. By centralizing the peer review process, we will not only reduce costs—we will also improve the quality, consistency ...