In 2023, an academic journal, the Annals of Operations Research, retracted an entire special issue because the peer review ...
Hosted on MSN12d
'Vague, confusing, and did nothing to improve my work': How AI can undermine peer reviewEarlier this year I received comments on an academic manuscript of mine as part of the usual peer review process, and noticed ...
10don MSN
Japanese startup Sakana said that its AI generated the first peer-reviewed scientific publication. But while the claim isn’t ...
Academics are accusing several AI startups of co-opting the peer review process at ICLR, a long-running AI conference, for ...
In a stark sign of scientists’ escalating frustration with how academic journals operate, researchers are taking on six ...
10d
MedPage Today on MSNNIH Move to Centralize Peer Review Worries Some ExpertsAccording to the release, the NIH's proposal to centralize peer review is "under review with implementation pending external ...
Queen’s researchers are investigating how scientific journals could improve their process for reviewing and publishing new papers. Can paying referees help?
Although university researchers don’t believe the change itself poses a clear risk to the scientific review process, ongoing chaos at the agency is fueling a degree of skepticism.
The increasing involvement of AI in the peer review process raises concerns about its impact on academic publishing. An ...
Institutional peer review led to recommended changes in more than one-quarter of radiotherapy treatment plans, according to results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.Recommendations for changes ...
Gail Wilson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results