Hosted on MSN9d
'Vague, confusing, and did nothing to improve my work': How AI can undermine peer reviewEarlier this year I received comments on an academic manuscript of mine as part of the usual peer review process, and noticed ...
7don MSN
Sakana said its AI generated the first peer-reviewed scientific publication. But while the claim isn't untrue, there are ...
There’s a controversy brewing over “AI-generated” studies submitted to this year’s ICLR, a long-running academic conference focused on AI. At least three AI labs — Sakana, Intology, and Autoscience — ...
7d
MedPage Today on MSNNIH Move to Centralize Peer Review Worries Some ExpertsAccording to the release, the NIH's proposal to centralize peer review is "under review with implementation pending external ...
Although university researchers don’t believe the change itself poses a clear risk to the scientific review process, ongoing ...
In a stark sign of scientists’ escalating frustration with how academic journals operate, researchers are taking on six ...
Queen’s researchers are investigating how scientific journals could improve their process for reviewing and publishing new papers. Can paying referees help?
The increasing involvement of AI in the peer review process raises concerns about its impact on academic publishing. An ...
12d
News-Medical.Net on MSNNIH plans to centralize peer review process for grantsToday the National Institutes of Health is announcing plans to centralize peer review of all applications for grants, cooperative agreements and research and development contracts within the agency's ...
Institutional peer review led to recommended changes in more than one-quarter of radiotherapy treatment plans, according to results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.Recommendations for changes ...
Agency says move will save money and reduce bias, but researchers are concerned about associated staff reductions ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results